Legal Opinion

Richmond Safety Gate Co. v. Ashbridge

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1902Published

In Equity. Suit for injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff is a corporation of the state of Indiana engaged in the manufacture of “Full Automatic Gates” for use in connection with freight elevators, and these gates. *221■it sells and erects throughout a considerable part of the United States ■and elsewhere. A Pennsylvania statute of May 5, 1899, provided that cities of the first class might, by general ordinance, regulate ■the management and inspection of elevator hoistways and elevator .shafts in said cities; and on April 6, 1900, an ordinance of the city of Philadelphia was duly approved, entitled “An ordinance to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Clason v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. City of Evansville v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. BoardmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  5. In re Sam KeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API