Legal Opinion

E. W. Ross Co. v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 30, 1921Published

Appeal from Hardin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Reversing.

Appellee and plaintiff below, Lee Akers, purchased from appellant and defendant below, E. W. Rosfe Company (a corporation), whose place of business is Springfield, Ohio, the material for a steel silo which was to be shipped by defendant to- Sonora, ’Kentucky, f. o. b; car at Springfield, Ohio, and the silo was to be constructed by plaintiff out of the material purchased by him from defendant according- to written directions furnished by it. There was a warranty that the silo, if constructed according to directions, would “not be affected by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Petry v. PetryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Youngstown Bridge Co. v. White's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Mason v. MeloanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Hunt v. SemoninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API