Ames Realty Co. v. Big Indian Mining Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana
In Equity. On questions of jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
- HUNT, District Judge.
Complainant, a corporation, resident and citizen of Missouri, brings this action to obtain an adjudication of the rights of itself and the defendants to the use of the waters of Prickly Pear creek and its branches and tributaries within the state of Montana, and for injunction against defendants, restraining them from diverting any of the waters of said creek and its tributaries until the prior *167rights of complainant are first satisfied. There are about 90 defendants, some of whom are residents and citizens bf Montana, while many-are residents and citizens of other…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Whitehead v. ShattuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carter Oil Co. v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1940
- United States v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Arizona Lead Mines, Inc. v. Sullivan Mining Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1943
- Brown v. CrawfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.