Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chavers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1962No. 7 Div. 682Published

1DissentCates, Judge

Respectfully, I vote to remand this cause. In spite of petitioner’s demand for inspection of a certified copy of an indictment or affidavit charging him with felony or other crime in Mississippi (18 U.S.C. § 3182), nothing was produced.

Ex parte State, in re Mohr, 73 Ala. 503, McGahagin v. State, ante, p. 236, 131 So.2d 425, and Code 1940, T. 15, § 52, are but mere reflections of § 3182, supra.

Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U.S. 80, 6 S.Ct. 291, 29 L.Ed. 544, says that the question as to the fugitive’s being substantially charged with a crime is one of law. This view is implicit in the Alabama statute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Blackwell v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. McGahagin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API