City State Bank v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
HIGHERS, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendants on the basis of the statute of limitations. The primary issue for our determination is whether there exists a genuine issue of material fact with respect to when the plaintiff banks discovered or reasonably should have discovered their cause of action against defendants. We hold that this issue was inappropriate for resolution by summary judgment and, therefore, we reverse the judgment of the court below.
FACTS
The plaintiffs, City State Bank and The Bank of Sharon, are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Bellamy v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Joseph Davis v. Patrick J. McGuigan - DissentingTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Heatherly v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Palazzo v. HarveyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- McNeil v. NofalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Medical Education Assistance Corp. v. State Ex Rel. East Tennessee State University Quillen College of MedicineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.