Legal Opinion

Siesel v. Tax Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

During the year 1930 and previously, plaintiff was a resident of Milwaukee county. His mother was then, and for many years prior had been, a resident of the state of Pennsylvania. While thus residing in Pennsylvania, she acquired and owned certain shares of stock in the General Electric Company, not a Wisconsin corporation. The original cost of said stock to her was $22.5105 per share. On March 6, 1930, said stock had increased in yalue to $78.75 per share. The stock certificates evidencing such shares had been always kept by her in Pennsylvanid.

*663On March 6, 1930, while plaintiff was visiting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Van Dyke v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Bundy v. NygaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Manitowoc Gas Co. v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. HowickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. HowickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Department of Revenue v. HowickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Department of Revenue v. HowickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API