Legal Opinion

Mouktabis v. M. A.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 2021No. A173044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

22 Submitted December 4, 2020; general and supplemental judgments reversed and remanded October 6, 2021 Nour Eddine MOUKTABIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. A., Defendant-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit Court 19CV27557; A173044

500 P3d 32

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims of defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court con- cluded that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, because plain- tiff had failed to present a genuine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hofer v. OHSUCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Bondick v. Mitchell SanchezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  3. Bondick v. Mitchell SanchezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API