Janski v. State

This matter comes to us upon the State of Wyoming’s application for a rehearing from our decision in Janski v. State, Wyo., 529 P.2d 201.

It is alleged in the application that:

“ . . . . this Court made an erroneous conclusion from the Record and Briefs of counsel that there was insufficient evidence to enable the jurors to conclude that the Defendant was predisposed1 to commit the crime.” [Emphasis mine]

The State says that there was “predisposition” to commit the crime in the mind of Janski at the moment of inducement and therefore no entrapment took place, while we held in the original…