Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. City of Tecumseh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1896No. 6624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Bush, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff. Upon a trial of the issues to a jury a verdict was returned for the defendant. Plaintiff presented to the court a motion for a new trial, *786which was overruled, and the following judgment was rendered, as shown by the journal entry: “It is therefore considered by the court that the said defendant recover of the said Nate Reynolds its costs herein expended, as heretofore by the verdict of the jury found.” This is merely a judgment for costs, and not a final adjudication disposing of the case. (Little v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Little, Maxwell & Co. v. GambleNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Gates v. SolomonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Root v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 OF CUSTER COUNTYNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API