Legal Opinion

Smith v. Illinois Central Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1908No. Appeal, No. 214PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 214, April T., 1908, by defendants, from order of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1902, No. 463, sustaining exceptions to bill of costs in case of J. W. Smith et ah, trading as J. W. Smith & Company, v. Illinois Central Railroad Company. Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ. Exceptions to bill of costs. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The court below refused to allow, as part of the costs of. the case, the amount expended for the printing of the paper-book of the appellant, in whose favor the final decision of this court was rendered. The appeal was taken from the judgment of. the court below on September'12, 1906. The Act of 1907, *586P. L. 83, was approved April 15, 1907. On May 13, 1907, the judgment of the court below was reversed by this court, and judgment entered in favor of the defendant non obstante veredicto.

The act provides, “That in all cases, either in law or equity, wherein an appeal is taken…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Sproul v. Standard Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Lane v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Sachse v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barnesboro Borough v. SpeiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Velazquez v. UPMC Bedford Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Brubaker's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Barto v. Beaver Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API