Legal Opinion

In the Interest of H.J.E.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1984No. 84-131, 84-443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

We have consolidated two appeals that arise as a result of a child in need of assistance (CINA) proceeding. In earlier proceedings, the juvenile court adjudicated H.J.E. to be a child in need of assistance and entered a dispositional order. In each of the present appeals, the appellant is T.D.E;, the father of the child. In the first appeal, the father challenges the juvenile court’s refusal to grant his request to terminate his parental rights. In the second appeal, he challenges the juvenile court’s redispositional order directing him to pay the cost of the child’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. B.A. v. R.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Klobnock Ex Rel. AbbottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of K.N.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. In the Interest of D.W.K.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. In the Interest of H.S. And S.N., Minor Children, V.R., MotherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. In the Interest of B.B.M.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. In the Interest of K.J.K.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API