Legal Opinion
Sartori v. Selsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 12, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from conspiring to introduce controlled substances into a correctional facility and from soliciting others to smuggle any item into a facility. As related in the misbehavior report, a letter that had been mailed by petitioner was returned to the correctional facility marked “Return to Sender.” In the letter, which was addressed to his niece, petitioner set forth detailed instructions as to how she could smuggle drugs into the facility and transfer them to him during a visit. The reporting officer stated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Delgado v. HurlburtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Carota v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Herrera-Martinez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Long v. Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Nunez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Encarnacion v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- De Matteis v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Karlin v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005