Morrow v. Helms
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Annie Jean Helms and several other persons (the "contestants") contested the validity of a will offered for probate as the will of Bernice Grimes; they filed their contest in the Coffee Probate Court. Pamela Morrow and Ruth H. Morrow (the "proponents") maintained that the will was valid. The case was transferred from the Coffee Probate Court to the Coffee Circuit Court. The will contest proceeded to a jury trial. The jury returned a verdict for the contestants. The proponents moved for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") at the close of the contestants' evidence and at the close of all the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ricwil, Inc. v. S.L. Pappas and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte Finance America Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Furrow v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Morrow v. HelmsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.