Legal Opinion

Rawls v. Saulsbury, Respess & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Sales. Trover-. Title. Vendor and purchaser. Debtor and creditor. Banks. New Trial. Before Judge Speer. Bibb Superior Court. October Term, 1879. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Stewart, Judge.

The plaintiff brought his action of trover against defendants for the recovery of forty-three bales of cotton.

*395On the trial, the facts presented were, in substance, as follows: That plaintiff was a farmer, and had forty-three bales of cotton in Forsyth, mostly in the warehouse of Mr. G. A Cabaniss. That on the 27th day of April, 1875, he sold the cotton to B. Pye & Son, of Forsyth, at 15 •cents per pound — amounting to $3,079.70. When trade was being made, he procured Mr. G. A. Cabaniss to make a •calculation ; delivered to Cabaniss the warehouse receipts, and took the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flanders & Huguenin v. MaynardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Livingston v. Anderson & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. In re SharpNew York Surrogate's Court · 1887
  5. Taft v. Guardian Trust Co.City of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API