Legal Opinion
Barnett Bank of Broward County v. Tussing (In re Tussing)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 29, 1996No. Bankruptcy No. 95-32508; Adversary No. 96-3028PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF PLURIES SUMMONS AND DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
WALTER J. KRASNIEWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on this Court’s Order to Show Cause dated May 7, 1996 (the “Show Cause Order”), which stated that the Court was considering dismissal of the instant adversary based on the Barnett Bank of Broward County’s (“Bank”) failure to perfect proper service pursuant to Fed. R.Bankr.P. 7004, to which the Bank has filed a response. Debtor Daniel R. Tussing (“Debtor”) filed a reply to the Bank’s response. The Bank has also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Elpidio Mendez v. Richard N. Elliot, Individually and in His Official Capacity the City of Gaithersburg, Maryland Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Fannie R. Braxton v. United States of America and Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Joe Putnam v. David MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Broitman v. Kirkland (In Re Kirkland)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. PORT HOPE SCHOOL DIST.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Smith ex rel. Estate of Kessel v. Port Hope School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006