Legal Opinion

Gillin v. Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme *212Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about October 3, 1997, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Although plaintiff is not time-barred from seeking recovery of pecuniary losses resulting directly from a breach of the implied agreement that defendant attorneys, in the course of representing plaintiff in 1986 and 1987, would use due care (see, Vogel v Lyman, 246 AD2d 422), defendants are nonetheless entitled to summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Volpe v. CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Logalbo v. PlishkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Ghandour v. Shearson Lehman Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Vogel v. LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Dinger v. Kling Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashton v. ScotmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API