Legal Opinion

People v. Estrada

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 28, 2009No. 1-08-2909PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toomin

In this appeal we confront the validity of a warrantless search of a lawfully parked and locked vehicle where its recent occupant is seized outside the vehicle in the absence of any articulable basis. In the proceedings below, the court granted defendant’s motion to quash his arrest and suppress the evidence derived therefrom. The State now appeals contending the court erred in finding the arresting officer did not have a reasonable suspicion sufficient to warrant an investigatory stop. Additionally, the State contends that the exclusionary rule should not apply in this case. For the reasons…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. DanielAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. People v. SimpsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. In re Rafeal E.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. People v. LopezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API