Legal Opinion
State v. Foster
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided January 14, 2004No. 2000-467-CAPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendant, Julius Foster, appeals from a Superior Court conviction for possession of cocaine, following the denial of his motion to suppress. This case came before the Court for oral argument on December 8, 2003, pursuant to an order directing all parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After considering the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the case should be decided at this time. For the reasons stated below, we…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. ApalakisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Estrada v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- State v. CasasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- State v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- State v. GouletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Caniglia v. StromCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.