Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred Hill

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1980No. 79-5574PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, Fred Hill, was convicted of conspiring to possess heroin and cocaine with intent to distribute these controlled substances. Four issues are raised on this appeal. First, whether the trial court erred in denying Hill’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the government trespassed Article IV(c) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (“IADA”), 18 U.S.C.App. pp. 1395-98 (1976), by failing to bring him to trial within 120 days of his arrival in the Northern District of Georgia. Second, whether the indictment should have been dismissed…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Harold Thomas Wilson, United States of America v. Bobby Eugene HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Victor Varella, Charles Gavin and Raul Felix ChineaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Errol Ricardo BizzardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Alejos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Clarence Duane HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API