Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1923No. 24,724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*805The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the bank commissioner to issue a certificate upon the state bank guaranty fund for the amount of a certificate of deposit. Briefly, the facts are:

The Farmers State Bank of Quenemo, Kansas, operating under the provisions of the State Guaranty Law, on May 13, 1921, issued a certificate to Joel Barrett for a deposit then made or an amount then on deposit, which certificate reads as follows:

“Deposits Guaranteed
“The Farmers State Bank 83-548

Quenemo, Kans. May 13, ’21. No. 3189

“Joel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Kirkwood v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. American State Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Emerson v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Verdi v. Helper State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Casten v. KreipeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Merchants Reserve State Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Burnaman v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Barrett v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API