Legal Opinion

In re Kent Refining Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 2, 1937No. 6572Published

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

The parties have stipulated that final disposition of the claim of Gelock Transfer Line may be made upon the certificate of the special master filed in the reorganization proceedings prior to adjudication of debtor as a bankrupt. The question for decision is one of law, the facts being uncontroverted and substantially as stated in the certificate of the special master. No restatement of the facts is deemed necessary.

The precise issue is whether or not under the mechanics’ lien statutes of Michigan (section 13101, C.L.Mich.1929), one who transports materials and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Alpena ex rel. Besser v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ohio River Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Mandel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  4. United States ex rel. Sabine & E. T. Ry. Co. v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
  5. United States v. Hercules Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API