Legal Opinion

Hasey v. Dodge

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1915No. Nos. 19,522—(166)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to eight vacant city lots. Willard A. Dodge, one. of the defendants, in his answer alleged that he.was the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the premises. The case was tried before Leary, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant Dodge. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff brought this action to determine adverse claims to eight vacant lots in an addition to the city of Minneapolis. Willard A. Dodge is the only defendant who interposed an answer. He alleged that he *469was the owner in fee of the lots and asked that his title thereto be quieted as against both plaintiff and the other defendants. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and rendered judgment thereon to the effect that Dodge was the owner in fee of the property, and that neither plaintiff nor the other defendants had any right, title, estate or interest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Bonham v. WeymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Utah Lead Co. v. Piute CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API