Flores v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1DissentLumpkin, Judge
I must strongly dissent to the Court’s decision to deny the Petition for Rehearing in this case. Without qualification, I have the greatest respect for the professional knowledge, experience and abilities of my colleagues on this Court. However, it now appears the plain language of the opinion is not being applied regarding the application of a harmless error analysis. The Court has now determined, in effect, the failure to give a presumption of innocence instruction is not subject to an application of harmless error because it violates a substantial statutory right. This decision is made…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.