Legal Opinion

Golden v. Sieghardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Anthony F. Sieghardt, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of 'New York on the 11th day of January, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury for $675, rendered after a trial at the New York Trial Term, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 14tli day of January, 1898, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J. :

The action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while working as a laborer in the employ of the *162defendant on the 14th of July, 1895. The defendant was in the construction of a sewer at St. Nicholas avenue, betw Hundred and Thirty-seventh and One Hundred and F. ik engaged een One orty-first it was fourteen rk for a accident ear One finch had wo: streets in the city of New York. As apart of this wo: necessary to dig a trench along the avenue to the depth of or fifteen feet. The plaintiff had beén engaged in this couple of weeks at a different place…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cullen v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gombert v. . McKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Schott v. Onondaga County Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Warszawski v. McWilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Litchfield v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Litchfield v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API