Novak v. District of Columbia

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.1 He appeals upon three grounds: first, that testimony regarding a urinalysis of a specimen taken while he was under arrest was improperly admitted because insufficiently identified and because there was insufficient evidence that the specimen was in the same condition when taken and when analyzed; second, that the specimen was obtained from appellant by inducement or compulsion and thus constituted an illegal search and seizure in violation of the Fourth…