Ackerman v. Ackerman

This case was here on a former appeal, wherein it was held that a sale made by the receiver appointed by the court, of certain property belonging to the estate, was void, for the reason that the order directing the sale provided that it take place on May 29, 1894, whereas the sale was made on June 18 and 19, 1894. Ackerman v. Ackerman, 50 Nebr., 54. After the decision above mentioned was handed down, the receiver moved the court for an order nunc pro tunc, to make the records show that an order was in fact made directing the receiver to sell the property upon the 18th day of June, it being…