Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2011No. DA 10-0026PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Timothy Michael Wright was convicted of sexual intercourse without consent following a three-day jury trial in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County. He now appeals, arguing that his right to due process was violated by the false and misleading presentation of DNA evidence, and also that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm Wright’s conviction but dismiss, without prejudice, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. He may pursue that claim through a timely petition for postconviction relief.

BACKGROUND

¶2 The evening of January 11, 2008, Wright…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jill Brown, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. State v. GundersonMontana Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kervinton Valentino v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. People v. FountainAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  3. G. Temple v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. G. Temple v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Chyatte v. GootkinDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API