United States v. Persinger
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Antonio Persinger appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Prior to trial, Persinger moved to suppress evidence of the firearm as the fruit of an illegal seizure. The district court denied the motion. On appeal, Persinger contends that the district court erred by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing, make findings of fact, and articulate conclusions of law. He also contends that the statute of conviction is unconstitutional because it represents an invalid exercise of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Baker v. Monroe TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hall v. RaechDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- PIERRE v. POLICE OFFICER MCCOLGANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021