Haering Oil Co. v. Beasley

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

After hearing all the evidence, the Chancery Court dismissed the plaintiff’s case for want of equity; and the correctness of that ruling is the point at issue on this appeal.

Appellant, The Haering Oil Company, Inc. (hereinafter called “Haering”), was the Bulk Sales Agent, originally for “Shell” petroleum products, and later for “Pan-Am” petroleum products. Appellee Beasley owned a filling station in Hot Springs; and in September, 1947, signed a contract with Haering to sell the products for which the latter was the Bulk Sales Agent. The said 1947 contract provided,…