Legal Opinion

Wake Development Co. v. Auburn-Fuller Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1934No. 7337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

m. , . appellant filed a claim m the above®tltled «fma-ship matter for $637,200, phis interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees, based upon a ten-year lease between the defendant in the receivership proceeding, Auburn-Fuller Company, the tenant, and the appellant, E. L. Cord, the landlord, for certain real estate in the city of Los Angeles, Cal. The total rental reserved under Gie lease was $648,000 payable in monthly installments of $5,400 each. The claim filed for $648,000 loss two months’ rent is rather indefinite as to tJf ^ upon ?hi(t th® amount is <*«“- ed' ^ ls…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. State Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. William Filene's Sons Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Hermitage Co. v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Gardiner v. William S. Butler & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Moore v. Investment Properties Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. Dickinson v. Universal Service Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Kennedy v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
  5. Moore v. McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API