Legal Opinion

Salerno v. Kearney

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William L. Underwood, Jr., J.

The crucial question to be determined on this motion to dismiss the complaint is whether or not a defendant may move to dismiss a complaint upon the ground that the court does not have jurisdiction .over her person (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 8) after she has preserved the objection in her answer. The case of Wahrhaftig v Space Design (29 AD2d 699) has held that a defendant is precluded from making the motion. This court respectfully disagrees with that holding.

The Wahrhaftig case is a literal reading of CPLR 3211 (subd [e]), and does not take into account the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. . MacYNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Wahrhaftig v. Space Design Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Sadif, S. A. v. Burnham & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rich v. LefkovitsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Majique Fashions, Ltd. v. Warwick & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API