Legal Opinion

State v. Rhamy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 2018No. A165295; A165294 (Control)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

*785Defendant challenges a probation condition, imposed in each of these consolidated cases, that prohibits him from applying for or using a registry identification card pursuant to the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (OMMA). He argues that, under ORS 137.542(2), the conditions of supervision for an OMMA registry cardholder "must be imposed in the same manner as the conditions of supervision of a person sentenced to probation related to prescription drugs," and that the court's unqualified prohibition on his participation in the OMMA-in the absence of any findings to justify that special…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. LynnOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API