Legal Opinion

Haroon Gul v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 9, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2016-1462Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Filed with the Classitie ed ASADULLAH HAROON GUL, } ion Secu er Petitioner, v. ) Case No. 16-cv-01462 (APM) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. et al., Respondents. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION This case presents a question never before addressed in the legions of habeas petitions filed by Guantanamo Bay detainees: whether a member of an associated force remains detainable even after his force declares peace because his actions as a member of that associated force make him legally part of or a substantial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API