Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Broadbent

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The Chancellor sustained a demurrer to this hill challenging’ the constitutionality of Chapter 165, Section 6, Public Acts of 1937, and Chapter 188, Public Acts of 1939, whereby the Legislature reduced the interest rate paid by the State to counties on highway re-imbursement bonds. A declaratory judgment was sought in the Chancery Court. The Chancellor dismissed the bill and complainants appeal.

Chapter 23 of the Public Acts of 1927 provided for the State to re-pay to the respective counties amounts expended by them in the construction of public highways up to the 31st day of December, 1926',…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Bell v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wright v. the Bank of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Robertson v. Town of EnglewoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Inorganics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1952
  2. HLFIP Holding, Inc. v. Rutherford County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  3. Hyden v. BakerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. Hyden v. BakerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
  5. Strickland v. BurnsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API