Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gill v. Smith & Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1929No. Appeal 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This is an appeal by a surety company, one of two defendants, from judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense entered against it and the other defendant, Smith, in a suit brought in the name of the Commonwealth, at the relation of John Gill, to recover on the official bond of defendants given pursuant to statute for the faithful performance by Smith of his duties as clerk of the court of quarter sessions of York County. There is no dispute of fact, the single question being whether the bond renders the surety company liable for the clerk’s failure to pay to Gill…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Commonwealth v. AndrewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Deckert's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  5. In re FinksDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KormuthGreene County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. PopchakLancaster County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1942
  3. Fines Under Vehicle Code of 1929, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API