Legal Opinion · Dissent

Saba v. Homeland Ins. Co. of America

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1953No. 33217Published

1DissentHart, J.

I dissent because, in my opinion, the remedy afforded to the plaintiff by the Probate Court and now finally approved by the majority opinion in this court is not legally available to him.

“At common law the authority of an arbitrator is, in its nature, revocable, and the general rule is that a naked executory agreement, not under authority of *245statute or rule of court, to submit to arbitration existing or prospective matters of difference is revocable by express act of either party or by implication of law at any time before the submission is consummated by a valid award.” (Italics supplied.) 3…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Haggart v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API