Heyman v. Third Nat. Bank of Jersey City
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Equity. Suit by Samuel Heyman, trustee in bankruptcy of Orlando Ricciardelli, against the Third National Bank of Jersey City, to recover alleged preferences. The master advised a decree dismissing the bill, to which both parties except.
1Opinion of the Court
RELDSTAB, District Judge.
For a number of years prior to the 8th of December, 1911, Orlando Ricciardelli (the bankrupt) kept an active banking account with the defendant. On that date he was contingently liable to the defendant as indorser on three unmatured promissory notes made by his wife, and discounted by the bank, the avails of which had been credited to his account. The first of these notes, for $900, fell due on December 20, 1911, the second, for $1,-600, on January 13, 1912, and the third, for $2,000, on February 15, 1912. On December 8, 1911, Ricciardelli gave the bank a check for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- In re EggertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Walbrun v. BabbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Maynard v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Fifth Nat. Bank of New York v. LyttleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Healy v. WehrungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- In re ClaytonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.