Legal Opinion

Teel v. Harnden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 20, 1942No. 4-6716PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

The appellants, Everett Teel and Gladys Teel Latham, brought suit in the Randolph chancery court ag’ainst the appellee, Adeline Hamden, on January 29, 1941, alleging that on and prior to February 3, 1920, appellant, Everett Teel, was the owner of 160 acres of land in Randolph county, Arkansas, describing said lands in the complaint; that on February 3, 1920, appellant, Everett Teel, conveyed by warranty deed said lands to his wife, Anna Teel; Anna Teel died on May 1, 1920, leaving surviving her her husband, Everett Teel, and Gladys Teel, now Gladys Latham; that said Gladys Latham had and was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davies v. PughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Roark v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Shurn v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Jordan v. Wilkerson & Carroll Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Clark v. WomackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Place v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Esmar v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Borrson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. BockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API