Legal Opinion

Gullatt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1930No. 5 Div. 807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The defendant was- indicted as Earl Gallatte, Gollatte, Gollatt, Guellett, and Gillett. He filed a plea of misnomer, alleging that his name was Earl Gullatt, and that he had never been known or called by- either of the names alleged in the indictment. Demurrer was -sustained to this plea on the ground that the names in the indictment and in the plea are idem sonans. If the names were sounded alike by parties who knew the defendant, this fact would have been available to the state on issue joined on the plea, but the court cannot say on demurrer that Gullatt is idemsonans with either of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Clements v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Campbell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eddy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Gandy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Gunaca v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Buxton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Gullatt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API