Legal Opinion

Foster v. Burnley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1937No. 26040PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Several excerpts from tlie charge of the court are complained of in the motion for new trial. While some of these detached fragments of the charge, if treated alone, are subject to slight criticism, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole, and the facts of the case, none of them discloses reversible error.

2. The verdict in favor of tlie defendant was amply authorized by the evidence. All of the special assignments of error are based on certain excerpts from the charge of the court, and are without substantial merit. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Pollard v. KentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API