Strong v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Petitioners, in connection with an apartment complex to be constructed and operated by them as partners, formed a corporation to obtain financing at a rate of interest in excess of the limit imposed by State law on loans to individuals. Title to the property was transferred to the corporation which executed the various documents relating to the financing and engaged in other related activities.
Read the full summary
Petitioners, in connection with an apartment complex to be constructed and operated by them as partners, formed a corporation to obtain financing at a rate of interest in excess of the limit imposed by State law on loans to individuals. Title to the property was transferred to the corporation which executed the various documents relating to the financing and engaged in other related activities. Held, the corporation was not merely a nominee whose existence could be ignored for tax purposes and the net operating losses during the years at issue were its losses and not those of the partnership.
1Opinion of the Court
William B. Strong and Constance L. Strong, et al., 1 Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Strong v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 2173-74, 2174-74, 2175-74, 2206-74, 2207-74, 2208-74
United States Tax Court
66 T.C. 12; 1976 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 137;
April 5, 1976, Filed
Decisions will be entered for the respondent.
Petitioners, in connection with an apartment complex to be constructed and operated by them as partners, formed a corporation to obtain financing at a rate of interest in excess of the limit imposed by State law on loans to individuals. Title to the property was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Carbide Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- National Investors Corporation v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.