Daniels-Greager v. Caledonian Insurance
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard
An action by an insurance company to recover from its agent the sum of an earned premium on a policy which had been issued by the agent and subsequently cancelled. A motion for a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff was sustained, and judgment entered accordingly.
It appears that November 16, 1934, the company appointed plaintiff in error as its agent at Norwood, San Miguel county, “with full power to receive and accept proposals for insurance covering risks * * * authorized by the company to insure, with full power and duty to collect, receive and receipt for premiums,” * * * and “shall,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Clay v. Eagle Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Wallace v. HatemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975