Legal Opinion

Bridgman v. Wilcut

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Marion District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Greene, J.

At the February term, A. D. 1852, of the Marion district court, Wilcufc filed his petition, setting forth that Bridgman and Need, at the September term, A. D. 1851, obtained a judgment against him for §258,65, that the contract on which said judgment was rendered, was made about January 1, 1851 ; and after the passage of the act to exempt a homestead from a forced sale, approved January 15,1849 ; that an execution issued on said judgment on the 2d of October, 1851, and was placed in the hands of the sheriff of said county ; that about the 15th of said month, said sheriff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Groff v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Ryerson v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1799
  3. Hotchkiss v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1843

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Estate of Glen A. Waterman, Jingles Ti-Okay WatermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Standard Water Control Systems, Inc. v. Michael D. Jones and Cori JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API