Legal Opinion

Affholder, Inc. v. Preston Carroll Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1989No. Nos. 86-5348, 86-5349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENGEL, Chief Judge.

This appeal requires us to consider whether, under Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, a cooperative litigation agreement executed by the plaintiff and defendant has eliminated any “case or controversy” between the parties, thus depriving the district court of jurisdiction over this litigation. The district court held that the litigation agreement eliminated a “case or controversy.” However, we hold that Article Ill’s “case or controversy” requirement has been met, and therefore we reverse and remand.

I

In 1974 the Louisville and Jefferson County…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Brett Roby v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Johnson v. KingstonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  4. In Re George W. Holder, Jr., Debtor. George W. Holder, Jr. v. William L. NewportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Brett Roby v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API