Legal Opinion

Aker v. Lipscomb

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 31, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, P. J.

— Plaintiff contracted with defendant to purchase of him some 526 acres of land in Lafayette County, Missouri. The contract was in. writing, and upon the execution thereof the plaintiff paid the defendant $2,000' under the terms of the contract. Omitting the description of the land and other portions of the contract not in issue in this suit, we have the following as the material portions of the contract.

Plaintiff claims that defendant failed to perfect the title within the time' stated, although the plaintiff, through his counsel, pointed out the defects. The action is to recover the $2,000…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinton v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Dalton v. LybargerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Progressive Farmers Ass'n v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re Progressive Farmers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Thomas J. Johnson Co., Inc. v. MuellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Hartley v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Powell v. DortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API