Legal Opinion
Fleischman v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 5, 1934No. Nos. 13290, 13602PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
On stipulation the two above-entitled suits were tried together, and, as the facts are the same in both, one opinion will suffice.
This suit is brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the libelant while employed as second assistant engineer on the U. S. S. Bird City.
On or about the 1st day of November, .1926, the libelant commenced a common-law action against the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation and Moore & McCormack Company, for the recovery of damages arising out of the injuries alleged to have been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- The IroquoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SkaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Holm v. Cities Service Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The BaymeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Graham v. Alcoa S. S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Carroll v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937