Surbaugh v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee recovered a judgment, from which is this appeal, for a commission alleged to have been earned by him upon the sale of a tract of land owned by appellant, which appellee had been employed to sell.
Stated in the light most favorable to appellee, the facts disclosed in the record are as follows: Appellee had an agency to sell the land, the terms thereof being defined in the correspondence between the parties. The agency was not exclusive, nor was it for a definite time. While this contract was in force, appellee showed the land to Faggs and priced it to him, but no sale was made because…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scott v. Patterson & ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Hodges v. BayleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Hunton v. MarshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Bodine v. Penn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Johnson v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Cole v. SalyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Beck v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957