Legal Opinion

McCran v. Lord

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 9, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On demurrer by each, defendant in quo lo-armnlo to determine which is entitled to exercise the office of mayor of the city of Orange, New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bergen, J.

The relator filed an information in the nature of a quo warranto calling upon both defendants to answer by what right they respectively claimed to exercise the office of mayor of the city Orange.

*44The information sets out that one Daniel E. Minnehan and three others were, on May 14th, 1918, duly elected commissioners of the city of Orange under the act approved April 25th, 1911, entitled “An act relating to, regulating and providing for the government of cities, towns, townships, boroughs, villages and municipalities governed by boards of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. South Broad Building & Loan Ass'n v. BrunettoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API