Giertz-Richardson v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and responses thereto. (Doc. Nos. 55, 56, 63 and 65.)
I. Standard of Review
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and’ admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The Court must draw all inferences from the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant and resolve all reasonable doubts in that party’s favor.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Nathaniel Porter, Jr. v. Walter S. Ray, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Orndorf v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Hca Health Services of Georgia, Inc. v. Employers Health Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bloom v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Richey v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Howard v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Ness v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Murray v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.