Legal Opinion

Pelman v. McDonald's Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 27, 2010No. 02 Civ. 07821(DCP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

POGUE, Judge:

Plaintiffs in this action are New York State consumers claiming, pursuant to Section 349 of New York’s General Business Law (“GBL § 349”), exposure to and injury from Defendant McDonald’s Corporation’s allegedly deceptive marketing scheme. Plaintiffs claim that the effect of Defendant’s affirmative representations and material omissions *85throughout this marketing scheme — from 1985 until the filing of this case in 2002 — was to mislead consumers into falsely believing that Defendant’s food products may be consumed on a daily basis without incurring any adverse…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Vaccariello v. XM Satellite Radio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Oscar v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Bibicheff v. PayPalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  5. Candelaria v. Conopco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API