Pelman v. McDonald's Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Judge:
Plaintiffs in this action are New York State consumers claiming, pursuant to Section 349 of New York’s General Business Law (“GBL § 349”), exposure to and injury from Defendant McDonald’s Corporation’s allegedly deceptive marketing scheme. Plaintiffs claim that the effect of Defendant’s affirmative representations and material omissions *85throughout this marketing scheme — from 1985 until the filing of this case in 2002 — was to mislead consumers into falsely believing that Defendant’s food products may be consumed on a daily basis without incurring any adverse…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Vaccariello v. XM Satellite Radio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Oscar v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Bibicheff v. PayPalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Candelaria v. Conopco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025